[omnia]

Tsk , tsk tsk....just look at the time and effort it must hv taken Max_Priest to write this post?!....sadly n unfortunately for you Max_Priest, all you have done is helped to give more publicity to 1807 n Ling Ling in particular...as i said previously, the 1807 okt uncle sld really tku for keeping 1807 on the SBF radar...like they say in the PR trade...any news is good news...!!

oh n this is so ironic as i still haven't as yet posted my fr on Ling Ling ...neither have i done anything to bump up this thread nor bump up publicity on Ling Ling in any other thread, unlike u Max_Priest with yr shameless lame bump up frs on yr apparent fav GL WLs...

Originally Posted by max_priest

Bro, I wonder why he did not thank you for your "No Hidden Agenda Contribution" and yet he went on to thank a samster, Siriusam who has no not even written or post anything about GL WL since his inception in SBF in year 2012 ... All his 44 posts so far (except the one and only FR on Ling Ling @ 1807) were not related to GL WL ... And he was actively participating in the Local Model Pic thread. Funnily, all of a sudden and out of the blue, he posted a "positive" FR on Ling Ling in the midst of this controversy ... So what does that tells us? This Siriusam's style of writing obviously is not newbie in the GL scene but his almost non-existence in GL Threads since he setup an account in SBF suggests "something" ... I am pretty sure you see where I am coming from ... Which once famous samsters who are very active in that thread? If anyone is keen, one can do a search of Siriusam's archived posts in SBF and see for yourself the background of this particular samster, Siriusam.

Omnia thanks him just because he has written a ""fantastically positive" FR on her ... Your FR on Ling Ling is in-between (alittle more towards negative in fact if one can read between the lines) and that suggests why he did not thank you ...

This is very obvious that Omnia has a hidden agenda to promote Ling Ling @ 1807 so aggressively and to the extent of being utterly defensive when anyone said something negative about her ... This is downright hypocritical ... Hahaha ... And yet he dare to shamelessly tell everyone he is a No-Agenda Contributor ... Bwhaahaha ... What a joke indeed!

As for Max_Priest's totally false baseless allegations abv...sorry to burst that huge over inflated deluded ego of yrs...but sadly n unfortunately for you...facts don't lie n the facts r on my side...so the joke is actually on you, Max_Priest!!

Fact: I have repasted all posts on Ling Ling, regardless of whether it was positive or negative or otherwise...

Federer801's neutral/negative fr on Ling Ling
http://sammyboyforum.org.nz/showpos...62&postcount=5

Kobayashi99's neutral fr on Ling Ling
http://sammyboyforum.org.nz/showpos...6&postcount=17

Fact: I actually thanked Federer801 for his neutral/negativefr on Ling Ling....

Originally Posted by omnia

First off a v big tku to Defunct n Nat28 for their earlier frs on this chiobu newbie Ling Ling(1807)...this is what i call geuine no agenda sharing which i fully support...generally agree wif their frs on this Ling Ling...i am taking the liberty of repasting their frs in this thread ...for completeness i am also including the latest fr on her by Federer801, which appears to reinforce that old chestnut, different strokes for different folks, tks for keeping it real mate!

Fact: I encourage all samsters to post frs/info on Ling Ling in particular n other GL WLs in general, regardless of whether their comments r good, bad or otherwise...provided it is done on the basis ofGenuine No Agenda Sharing...

Originally Posted by omnia

This is the latest comment on Ling Ling fm another thread that i hv taken the liberty to repaste in here...

Said it before n i shall say it again...i fully support Genuine No Agenda Sharing...good, bad or otherwise comments/views does not matter...

As for why I had thanked n upped Siriusam for his fr on Ling Ling and not commented on Slyer's fr on Ling Ling...i wld hv thought the reasons were obvious, well i guess only to discerning objective samsters!...

Fact: Siriusam did not post any caveat in his fr...

Fact: Siriusam appeared to be zapped by that hypocrite troll Max_Priest and/or his apparent gang for posting his fr...

Fact: Slyer has made it clear with caveats, more than once i sld add, that his fr was honest, truthful and with no hidden agenda...

Fact: Unlike Siriusam, Slyer was not zapped for posting his fr...

Fact: I had previously cum out in the open to support Slyer when he was wrongly called a clone of Max_Priest...even to the extent of helping to upp his rep points when he was being zapped...curiously n amusingly enough i don't think Slyer needed my paltry help viz rep points!...Samsters who get zappped n who lust for rep points perhaps sld consult Slyer or for deeper advice Max_Priest, as both these chaps appear to be v 'astute' in turning ard massive zapping to their rep points accounts...!!

so like i had said before, Slyer sld or ought to know my take on him by now...oh n once again i trust that Slyer is "only interested in fucking prc whores", and nothing else, as he had previously told me...

Originally Posted by slyer

My honest, no hidden agenda, concise FR on

Ling Ling (L18 H07)

Originally Posted by slyer

It's ok la. I don't need anyone to thank me for my fr on ling ling.

I'm just being truthful.